A while ago I
posted about the Randi Foundation challenge.
In the comments was this:
At 3:21 PM, Smokefoot said...
I have heard some people who feel that the Randi tests are rigged to guarantee failure. Certainly I have not seen any sign of this in the reading I have done on his tests, but it shows one way people deal with the failure to show beat Randi's test. I got to thinking, how can I verify that some of the common excuses are merely lame excuses? I suppose I could accept the challenge, make a claim, pass the tests, and win the prize. Next best would be to make a claim, fail the tests but closely observe the process and be satisfied that all was fair.
The one thing I can think of that might be easier for me to verify would be to check the following particular excuse: the James Randi Education Foundation doesn't even have the money. On his web site Randi even explains how one might verify that the money is real. Shall we try and find out if the money is real, and thus show (to ourselves) whether the people who use that excuse are just scared to be tested?
David